Friday, November 6, 2009

Aloha Friday



It's Aloha Friday over at An Island Life! Answer my question and make sure you post one on your blog! After that, go relax because today is Friday!!

First off I want to say THANK YOU to every one who answered my question last week! This weeks question is ??????
DO you think it is more difficult to transition from one to two children or two to three. I'm expecting my third in Feb? Ive heard after you have two each additional child makes things no harder?? My first two are 20 months apart and this baby named Ellie will be around 22 months apart. I know I'm crazy ..lol..

16 comments:

  1. Hardest is from 2 to 3!! But, after 3, it's all the same!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I definitely think transitioning from two to three was easier than one to two. My oldest boys are 20 months apart and my youngest a little over three years younger than my middle child. I will admit that there are times when things seem impossible but you will always find a way to get through. Its what moms do. I really want to know what happens when you go from three to four!

    ReplyDelete
  3. we have no kids yet but from what I've heard is more difficult to make the transition between kid#1 and kid#2 than from kid#2 to the rest of 'em:):):)

    Aloha!

    * my Aloha Friday's up too:)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I only have two children. From what everyone has always told me, going from 1-2 was the hardest transition for the family.

    ReplyDelete
  5. One to two def. After two three just falls into place. Crazy busy!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have one..so I would not know,

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have no kids, but i have heard that transition from two to three is easier.
    Come and have a look at my big birthday giveaway (see left sidebar).

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have 2 and they are 5.5 years apart. It was hard going backwards again, but I knew more so many years later.

    ReplyDelete
  9. i just had my 2nd child 6 months ago....so far it hasn't been too terrible! I expect going to 3 might be harder someday

    ReplyDelete
  10. just had my first, so I am not really sure...

    ReplyDelete
  11. I only have the two and they are twenty months apart -- which I found rough at the time because I wasn't great with juggling the two of them. I don't know how'd I do with a third but I think we're going to stick with two :-)

    ReplyDelete
  12. when I had my first two they are 15 months apart it was an adjustment.I had my third when my then middle was 2.5 peice of cake!! Always a little hard in the beginning because of lack of sleep but once you get thru that you will love it! Stop by

    ReplyDelete
  13. I can't help you with transitioning from 1 to 2 because I was blessed with 2 my first try. But what I can tell you is that I have many many friends who have 3, 4, 5 kids. The hardest transition they tell me is from 2 to 3...you have to have the bigger car, you have to buy more than a 4 piece place setting, you only have two hands, etc. but after 3...that's when it's no different. The big change in my opinion is 2 to 3. Congrats on your new baby and you'll do fine. God doesn't put things on us that we can't handle. :) Best of luck!
    www.twin-spiration.com

    ReplyDelete
  14. I would have to say 2-3 was the hardest for me. not trying to scare you. im sure you will do just fine! congratulations!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. In my experience going from 1 to 2 was by far harder. They were 3 and 1/2 years apart and from 2 to 3 was 16 months apart. That was a piece of cake and I was as nervous and fincky with number 3. I knew the whole gambit by then! Best wishes and RELAX!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Screwed up that last post, I meant to say I WASN`T as nervous with number 3 child...

    ReplyDelete